Skip to content

Update eslint npm packages (major) #8128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
hash-worker wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update eslint npm packages (major) #8128

hash-worker wants to merge 1 commit into from
+140 −336

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Nov 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
eslint-config-sheriff (source) 29.0.0 -> 31.1.0 age confidence
eslint-plugin-storybook (source) 9.1.13 -> 10.1.4 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

AndreaPontrandolfo/sheriff (eslint-config-sheriff)

v31.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • 9ff5542: feat: Replace typescript-eslint config() with ESLint built-in defineConfig()
    Closes #​418

v31.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • 8554daa: feat: fixed release flow

v29.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • 5537e88: fix(config): add support for typed rules in Astro and fix naming convention rule for Astro endpoints
storybookjs/storybook (eslint-plugin-storybook)

v10.1.4

Compare Source

v10.1.3

Compare Source

v10.1.2

Compare Source

  • Checklist: Fix how state changes are reported and drop some completion restrictions - #​33217, thanks @​ghengeveld!

v10.1.1

Compare Source

v10.1.0

Compare Source

Easier to setup, more accessible to use

Storybook 10.1 focuses on two key improvements: installation and accessibility:

  • ♿ UI overhaul to fix hundreds of a11y issues
  • 🧑‍💻 CLI overhaul for faster, more reliable install
  • ✅ Checklist-based onboarding guide for new users

The release also contains compatibility fixes for:

  • 🅰️ Angular 21 support
  • 🦀 RSbuild install support in CLI
  • ⚡️ Preact support for Vitest addon

Finally, it contains two highly-requested experimental features:

  • 📋 Component manifest for Storybook MCP
  • ⚛️ Improved JSX code snippets for React
List of all updates

v10.0.8

Compare Source

v10.0.7

Compare Source

v10.0.6

Compare Source

v10.0.5

Compare Source

v10.0.4

Compare Source

v10.0.3

Compare Source

v10.0.2

Compare Source

v10.0.1

Compare Source

v10.0.0

Compare Source

Storybook 10 contains one breaking change: it’s ESM-only. This simplifies our distribution and reduces install size by 29% while simultaneously unminifying dist code for easier debugging.
It also includes features to level up your UI development, documentation, and testing workflows:

  • 🧩 Module automocking for easier testing
  • 🏭 Typesafe CSF factories Preview for React
  • 💫 UI editing and sharing optimizations
  • 🏷️ Tag filtering exclusion and configuration for sidebar management
  • 🔀 Next 16, Vitest 4, Svelte async components, and more!
List of all updates

v9.1.16

Compare Source

v9.1.15

Compare Source

v9.1.14

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge November 30, 2025 13:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) labels Nov 30, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.84%. Comparing base (37d1e0e) to head (64c2f6e).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8128   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.84%   57.84%           
=======================================
  Files        1167     1167           
  Lines      109264   109264           
  Branches     4976     4976           
=======================================
+ Hits        63208    63209    +1     
+ Misses      45310    45309    -1     
  Partials      746      746
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.18% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 30.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 49.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.46% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 83.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 3e66cbf to e4f15f4 Compare December 1, 2025 15:12
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from e4f15f4 to 3d530e2 Compare December 1, 2025 18:16
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 3d530e2 to 0e2a5a4 Compare December 3, 2025 21:39
@vilkinsons vilkinsons requested a review from indietyp December 4, 2025 07:17
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 0e2a5a4 to ea18199 Compare December 5, 2025 10:47
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from ea18199 to 64c2f6e Compare December 6, 2025 08:18
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.674 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-64.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}64.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$46.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$493 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$93.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$85.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$324 \mathrm{ms} \pm 851 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$18.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$9.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.857 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$72.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$81.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$88.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$80.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$58.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 509 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 586 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.870 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$585 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@indietyp indietyp Awaiting requested review from indietyp

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@CiaranMn CiaranMn

Labels

area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@indietyp @CiaranMn