Upgrade sqlalchemy to version 2 #562
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@emanuelen5 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on updating the SQLAlchemy version constraint in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant DB
Client->>API: Request password reset
API->>DB: Get member by token
DB-->>API: Return member
API-->>Client: Send password reset email
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
emanuelen5
force-pushed
the
sqlalchemy-2-upgrade
branch
from
2df5bab to
4b72c44
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
api/requirements.txt (1)
4-4: Consider pinning to a specific minor version for better stability.While
~=2.0allows for compatible updates, it's recommended to pin to a specific minor version (e.g.,sqlalchemy~=2.0.23) to ensure consistent behavior across environments and prevent unexpected issues from patch updates.api/src/shop/email.py (1)
13-13: Consider adding error handling for non-existent members.The SQLAlchemy 2 syntax update looks good. However,
db_session.get()will returnNonefor non-existent members, which could lead to aNoneTypeerror in the subsequentsend_messagecall.Consider adding error handling:
- member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + if member is None: + raise ValueError(f"Member with id {member_id} not found")api/src/shop/ordered_entity.py (1)
Line range hint
25-27: Consider modernizing the display_order query.The display_order query still uses the legacy
query()style. Consider updating to SQLAlchemy 2's new style:- data["display_order"] = (db_session.query(func.max(self.model.display_order)).scalar() or 0) + 1 + result = db_session.execute( + select(func.max(self.model.display_order)) + ).scalar() + data["display_order"] = (result or 0) + 1Also, consider documenting that this implementation is MySQL-specific due to the locking mechanism used.
api/src/shop/filters.py (2)
Line range hint
34-45: Consider improving error messages for better user experience.The error messages could be more user-friendly and provide clearer guidance:
- "You already have a makerspace access subscription. You must cancel your subscription if you want to buy invidual makerspace access months." + "You already have an active makerspace access subscription. Please cancel your current subscription before purchasing individual makerspace access months." - "You already have a base membership subscription. You must cancel your subscription if you want to buy invidual base membership years." + "You already have an active base membership subscription. Please cancel your current subscription before purchasing individual base membership years."Also, there are typos in both messages: "invidual" should be "individual".
Based on the shell script results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient evidence showing the consistent pattern of null checks across the codebase.
Add null check for non-existent member
The codebase consistently checks for non-existent members when using
db_session.get(Member, member_id). For example:
shop/transactions.py:if member is None: raise BadRequest(f"Unable to find member with id {member_id}")shop/stripe_subscriptions.py:if member is None: raise BadRequest(f"Unable to find member with id {member_id}")shop/pay.py:if member is None: raise BadRequest(f"Unable to find member with id {member_id}")def filter(cart_item: "CartItem", member_id: int) -> None: member: Member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + if member is None: + raise BadRequest(f"Unable to find member with id {member_id}") if sub == SubscriptionType.LAB:🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
34-47: Verify error handling for non-existent members.The
db_session.get()method returnsNonefor non-existent records. The current implementation might raise an AttributeError when accessingstripe_labaccess_subscription_idorstripe_membership_subscription_idon aNonevalue.Consider adding a null check:
def filter(cart_item: "CartItem", member_id: int) -> None: member: Member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + if member is None: + raise BadRequest(f"Member with ID {member_id} not found") if sub == SubscriptionType.LAB:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there's any null check before accessing member attributes # across the codebase to ensure consistent error handling. # Test 1: Look for similar member retrieval patterns rg -A 5 "db_session\.get\(Member," # Test 2: Look for null checks after member retrieval ast-grep --pattern 'if $member is None: $$$'Length of output: 9037
api/src/service/auth.py (1)
Line range hint
42-43: Consider wrapping expired token cleanup in a transaction.The deletion of expired tokens could potentially affect concurrent requests. Consider wrapping this operation in a transaction with appropriate isolation level.
if access_token.expires < now: + with db_session.begin(): db_session.query(AccessToken).filter(AccessToken.expires < now).delete() raise Unauthorized("Unauthorized, expired access token.", fields="bearer", what=EXPIRED)api/src/core/models.py (2)
Line range hint
41-64: Consider using SQLAlchemy ORM features for the Login table.While the current implementation works, consider creating a proper SQLAlchemy model for the Login table in the future. Even without a primary key, you can use:
__table_args__ = {'primary_key': []}to define a table without PK- Column definitions with proper types
- Query methods using SQLAlchemy's expression language
This would provide:
- Better type safety
- Query composition capabilities
- Consistency with other models
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response about the SQLAlchemy upgrade impact:
Several SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns need updates for 2.x compatibility
The codebase contains multiple patterns that require updates for SQLAlchemy 2.x:
Query-style ORM operations need to be replaced with
select()-based queries:
- Numerous instances of
db_session.query()should be updated todb_session.execute(select())- Direct
filter()andfilter_by()calls need to be wrapped inselect()Session operations need review:
- Multiple direct
db_session.add()calls should be evaluated for bulk operationscommit()andflush()usage patterns should be reviewed for transaction management- Raw
execute()calls should usetext()consistentlyRelationship loading patterns:
- Several
relationship()definitions withlazy="dynamic"need updatesjoinedload()usage should be evaluated for potentialselectinload()replacement- Relationship cascade settings should be reviewed for SQLAlchemy 2.x behavior changes
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-64: Verify SQLAlchemy 2.x compatibility across the codebase.While the changes in this file look correct, let's verify other potential SQLAlchemy 2 incompatibilities:
Based on the search results, I can see several patterns that need to be updated for SQLAlchemy 2.x compatibility:
- Many raw
query()calls that need to be replaced withselect()filter()andfilter_by()usage withoutselect()joinedload()usage that should be reviewed for potentialselectinload()replacementLet me verify one more aspect to ensure we have a complete picture:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for common SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns that need updates in 2.x echo "Checking for deprecated Query usage..." rg "db_session\.query\(" -A 2 echo "Checking for deprecated filter/filter_by usage without select..." rg "\.filter\(|\.filter_by\(" -A 2 echo "Checking for raw execute calls without text()..." rg "execute\(['\"]" -A 2 echo "Checking for joinedload without selectinload..." rg "joinedload\(" -A 2Length of output: 242588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns echo "Checking for session.add/delete usage..." rg "db_session\.(add|delete)\(" -A 2 echo "Checking for relationship loading patterns..." rg "relationship\(" -A 2 echo "Checking for session.commit usage..." rg "db_session\.commit" -A 2Length of output: 21398
api/src/quiz/models.py (2)
50-50: Consider documenting the cascade behavior.Since the cascade behavior is now explicitly configured, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the intended behavior for future maintainers.
Example documentation:
- question = relationship(QuizQuestion, backref="options", cascade_backrefs=False) + # Disable automatic cascading through backrefs to prevent unexpected deletions + # Child records (options) won't be automatically deleted when parent (question) is deleted + question = relationship(QuizQuestion, backref="options", cascade_backrefs=False)Also applies to: 69-69
Line range hint
1-77: Consider adding type hints for better IDE support.While reviewing the SQLAlchemy 2 changes, I noticed that the models could benefit from type hints, which are better supported in SQLAlchemy 2.x. This would improve IDE support and make the code more maintainable.
Example for the Question relationship:
from typing import List class QuizQuestion(Base): options: List["QuizQuestionOption"] = relationship("QuizQuestionOption", backref="question", cascade_backrefs=False)api/src/multiaccessy/invite.py (1)
70-71: Consider removing redundant assertionThe
assert member is not Nonecheck is redundant because this code is only reached aftercheck_labaccess_requirementsverifies the member exists. If the member doesn't exist, anAccessyInvitePreconditionFailedexception would be raised earlier in the function.member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) -assert member is not Noneapi/src/member/member.py (2)
40-40: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for non-existent members.The update to use
db_session.get()aligns well with SQLAlchemy 2's simplified API. However, consider adding error handling for cases where the member doesn't exist.- member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + member = db_session.get(Member, member_id) + if member is None: + raise BadRequest(f"Member with id {member_id} not found")
Line range hint
58-58: Update member retrieval to use SQLAlchemy 2 pattern.For consistency with other changes and SQLAlchemy 2 patterns, update the member retrieval.
- member: Member = db_session.query(Member).get(member_id) + member: Member = db_session.get(Member, member_id)api/src/member/views.py (1)
43-45: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.The update to SQLAlchemy 2.0's
db_session.get()syntax is correct. However, the double assertion pattern could be simplified with more descriptive error handling.Consider this more descriptive error handling approach:
- m2 = db_session.get(Member, g.user_id) - assert m2 is not None - m["has_password"] = m2.password is not None + m2 = db_session.get(Member, g.user_id) + if m2 is None: + raise ValueError(f"Member {g.user_id} not found in database") + m["has_password"] = m2.password is not Noneapi/src/shop/shop_data.py (1)
Line range hint
1-166: Consider further SQLAlchemy 2 modernization opportunities.While the current changes improve the eager loading patterns, there are opportunities to further modernize the code using SQLAlchemy 2's preferred patterns:
- Replace
db_session.query()withselect()statements- Use
scalars()for single-model queries- Leverage SQL expression language improvements
Example transformation:
# Before query = ( db_session.query(Transaction) .filter(Transaction.member_id == member_id) .order_by(desc(Transaction.id)) ) # After stmt = ( select(Transaction) .where(Transaction.member_id == member_id) .order_by(desc(Transaction.id)) ) result = db_session.execute(stmt).scalars()Would you like me to provide more specific examples for each query in this file?
api/src/core/auth.py (6)
Line range hint
27-37: Update member retrieval inget_member_by_user_identification.For consistency with SQLAlchemy 2 style, consider updating the query patterns in this function:
try: if user_identification.isdigit(): - return db_session.query(Member).filter_by(member_number=int(user_identification), deleted_at=None).one() + return db_session.execute( + db_session.select(Member) + .filter_by(member_number=int(user_identification), deleted_at=None) + ).scalar_one() - return db_session.query(Member).filter_by(email=user_identification, deleted_at=None).one() + return db_session.execute( + db_session.select(Member) + .filter_by(email=user_identification, deleted_at=None) + ).scalar_one()
Line range hint
146-147: Update delete operation to use SQLAlchemy 2 style.Consider updating the delete operation to use the new SQLAlchemy 2 style:
- db_session.query(PasswordResetToken).filter(PasswordResetToken.id == password_reset_token.id).delete() + db_session.execute( + db_session.delete(PasswordResetToken) + .filter_by(id=password_reset_token.id) + )
Line range hint
171-174: Update count query to use SQLAlchemy 2 style.Consider updating the count query to use the new SQLAlchemy 2 style:
- count = ( - db_session.query(AccessToken).filter(AccessToken.user_id == user_id, AccessToken.access_token == token).delete() - ) + result = db_session.execute( + db_session.delete(AccessToken) + .filter_by(user_id=user_id, access_token=token) + ) + count = result.rowcount
Line range hint
180-189: Update list query to use SQLAlchemy 2 style.Consider updating the list query to use the new SQLAlchemy 2 style:
return [ dict( access_token=access_token.access_token, browser=access_token.browser, ip=access_token.ip, expires=access_token.expires.isoformat(), ) - for access_token in db_session.query(AccessToken).filter(AccessToken.user_id == user_id) + for access_token in db_session.execute( + db_session.select(AccessToken) + .filter_by(user_id=user_id) + ).scalars() ]
Line range hint
193-203: Update service token query to use SQLAlchemy 2 style.Consider updating the service token query to use the new SQLAlchemy 2 style:
try: - access_token = db_session.query(AccessToken).filter_by(user_id=user_id).one() + access_token = db_session.execute( + db_session.select(AccessToken) + .filter_by(user_id=user_id) + ).scalar_one() access_token.access_token = generate_token() db_session.add(access_token) except NoResultFound: raise NotFound()
Line range hint
207-217: Update service tokens list query to use SQLAlchemy 2 style.Consider updating the service tokens list query to use the new SQLAlchemy 2 style:
return [ dict( user_id=access_token.user_id, service_name=SERVICE_NAMES.get(access_token.user_id, "unknown service"), access_token=access_token.access_token, permissions=",".join(SERVICE_PERMISSIONS.get(access_token.user_id, [])), ) - for access_token in db_session.query(AccessToken).filter(AccessToken.user_id < 0) + for access_token in db_session.execute( + db_session.select(AccessToken) + .filter(AccessToken.user_id < 0) + ).scalars() ]api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py (1)
Line range hint
116-196: Consider configuring transaction isolation level for payment processing.Payment processing typically requires serializable isolation to prevent concurrent modifications. Consider configuring the transaction isolation level explicitly:
from sqlalchemy import event @event.listens_for(db_session, 'after_begin') def receive_after_begin(session, transaction, connection): if 'stripe_payment_intent' in connection.info: connection.execute('SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE')This ensures that payment-related database operations are properly isolated, preventing race conditions during concurrent payment processing.
api/src/test_aid/db.py (1)
Line range hint
28-266: Consider reviewing other SQLAlchemy operations.While the raw SQL query has been updated, there are several other SQLAlchemy operations in this file that might benefit from updating to SQLAlchemy 2.x style:
- The
delete_categorymethod uses the Query API:db_session.query(ProductCategory).filter(ProductCategory.id == category_id).delete()
- The
delete_productmethod uses similar Query API patterns.Consider updating these to use the new SQLAlchemy 2.x style with
select()anddelete()constructs.Example refactor for
delete_category:from sqlalchemy import delete # ... def delete_category(self, id: Optional[int] = None) -> None: assert self.category is not None category_id = id or self.category.id assert category_id is not None stmt = delete(ProductCategory).where(ProductCategory.id == category_id) db_session.execute(stmt) db_session.flush()api/src/quiz/views.py (2)
287-289: LGTM with suggestions: Raw SQL query updated correctly for SQLAlchemy 2.The change to use
text()wrapper with parameterized queries is correct for SQLAlchemy 2. However, consider the following improvement:The current query uses MySQL-specific time functions (
TIME_TO_SEC,TIMEDIFF). For better database portability, consider using SQLAlchemy's built-in functions. Here's an example:from sqlalchemy import func # Replace the raw SQL with SQLAlchemy expression language query = ( db_session.query( func.extract('epoch', func.max(QuizAnswer.created_at) - func.min(QuizAnswer.created_at) ).label('t') ) .join(QuizQuestion) .filter(QuizQuestion.quiz_id == quiz_id) .group_by(QuizAnswer.member_id) .order_by('t') ) seconds_to_answer_quiz = query.all()This approach would:
- Work across different database backends
- Leverage SQLAlchemy's query builder
- Maintain type safety
Line range hint
1-324: Consider gradually migrating to SQLAlchemy 2's new query style.While the current changes correctly address the immediate needs for SQLAlchemy 2 compatibility, there are several query patterns throughout the file that could benefit from migrating to SQLAlchemy 2's new style using
select(). This isn't blocking but could be done in a future iteration.Example pattern to consider updating:
# Current style db_session.query(QuizQuestion).filter(...) # SQLAlchemy 2 style from sqlalchemy import select db_session.execute( select(QuizQuestion).filter(...) ).scalars()Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt?
api/src/shop/models.py (1)
Line range hint
21-278: Consider implementing a comprehensive testing strategy for the SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade.The consistent addition of
cascade_backrefs=Falseacross all relationships represents a significant change in how SQLAlchemy handles relationship cascades. To ensure a smooth upgrade:
- Consider adding integration tests that specifically verify cascade behaviors
- Document any changes in cascade behavior for future reference
- Plan for a careful deployment strategy, possibly with a feature flag
- Monitor the application logs after deployment for any cascade-related issues
This will help maintain data integrity during and after the upgrade.
api/src/shop/pay.py (3)
164-167: Improve error message for member lookup.The error message should be more user-friendly and specific about the issue.
Consider this improvement:
- if member is None: - raise BadRequest(f"Unable to find member with id {member_id}") + if member is None: + raise BadRequest("Your member account could not be found. Please ensure you are logged in correctly.")
209-212: Document the subscription dependency rule.While the member retrieval change is correct, this function contains important business logic about lab subscription dependencies. Consider adding a docstring to document this rule.
Add documentation:
def cancel_subscriptions(data: CancelSubscriptionsRequest, user_id: int) -> None: + """Cancel the specified subscriptions for a member. + + Note: Due to business rules, canceling a membership subscription will automatically + cancel any lab subscription, as lab access requires an active membership. + + Args: + data: The cancellation request containing subscription types to cancel + user_id: The ID of the member + Raises: + BadRequest: If the member is not found + """
Line range hint
1-338: Consider adding integration tests for payment flows.Given the critical nature of payment processing and subscription management, and considering the current test failures, it would be beneficial to add comprehensive integration tests that cover:
- Payment flows with insufficient funds
- Subscription cancellation with dependencies
- Member cleanup scenarios
Consider implementing these tests using the SQLAlchemy 2.0 patterns and mocked Stripe responses. This will help ensure the upgrade doesn't introduce regressions in these critical paths.
api/src/statistics/maker_statistics.py (1)
Line range hint
1-400: Consider architectural improvements for database access.While the current changes address the immediate SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade needs, consider these future improvements:
- Implement repository pattern to encapsulate database access
- Create database-agnostic query builders for complex queries
- Move common database operations into reusable utilities
api/src/service/entity.py (2)
Line range hint
338-346: LGTM! Session.get() correctly implemented in delete operation.The migration to
session.get()is properly done while preserving the soft delete functionality.Consider adding type hints to improve code clarity:
- def delete(self, entity_id: int, commit: bool = True) -> None: + def delete(self, entity_id: int, commit: bool = True) -> None: + """Soft delete an entity by setting its deleted_at timestamp. + + Args: + entity_id: The primary key of the entity to delete + commit: Whether to commit the transaction immediately + + Raises: + NotFound: If the entity doesn't exist + """ entity = db_session.get(self.model, entity_id)
Migration to SQLAlchemy 2.0's Session.get() needs attention in member.py
Found one remaining instance of the deprecated
query().get()pattern that needs to be updated:
api/src/member/member.py:member: Member = db_session.query(Member).get(member_id)The rest of the codebase (27 occurrences) has been properly migrated to use
db_session.get(), including the changes inservice/entity.py.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
307-311: LGTM! Correctly migrated to SQLAlchemy 2.0's Session.get() method.The change from
query().get()tosession.get()follows SQLAlchemy 2.0's best practices for retrieving single entities by primary key.Let's verify consistent usage of Session.get() across the codebase:
Let me gather more targeted information to verify the SQLAlchemy migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of the deprecated query().get() pattern rg "query\([^)]+\)\.get\(" # Search for the new Session.get() pattern to confirm migration rg "db_session\.get\("Length of output: 2549
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of query().get() pattern specifically rg "\.query\([^)]+\)\.get\(" --type py # Search for the new session.get() pattern rg "\.get\([^)]+\)" --type py -B 1 | grep -E "(session|db_session)\.get\("Length of output: 2539
api/src/shop/transactions.py (2)
112-118: Consider adding type hints for SQL parameters.The SQL query execution has been correctly updated to use
text()for SQLAlchemy 2 compatibility. The parameterization is secure against SQL injection.Consider adding type hints for the parameters to improve maintainability:
db_session.execute( text( """ INSERT INTO webshop_transaction_actions (content_id, action_type, value, status) SELECT :content_id AS content_id, action_type, SUM(:count * value) AS value, :pending AS status FROM webshop_product_actions WHERE product_id=:product_id AND deleted_at IS NULL GROUP BY action_type """ ), - { - "content_id": content.id, - "count": content.count, - "pending": TransactionAction.PENDING, - "product_id": content.product_id, - }, + { + "content_id": content.id, # type: int + "count": content.count, # type: int + "pending": TransactionAction.PENDING, # type: str + "product_id": content.product_id, # type: int + }, )
SQLAlchemy 2.x migration is incomplete in this file
The code still uses some legacy SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns that should be updated to 2.x style:
db_session.query()should be replaced withdb_session.execute(select())- Direct
get()calls should usedb_session.get()(this is already correctly updated)Specific locations needing updates:
- Line ~50:
db_session.query(Transaction).filter(...)- Line ~150:
db_session.query(TransactionAction, TransactionContent, Transaction).join(...)- Line ~400:
db_session.query(Product).filter(...)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-424: Verify complete migration to SQLAlchemy 2.x style queries.Let's verify that all SQLAlchemy queries in this file have been updated to the new style.
Let me check the specific filter usage to ensure it follows SQLAlchemy 2.x style.
Let me check for the recommended SQLAlchemy 2.x select() style usage pattern to compare against the current implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old-style SQLAlchemy queries that might need updating # Test 1: Check for old-style .get() usage echo "Checking for old-style .get() usage..." rg -l "query\([^)]+\)\.get\(" api/src/shop/transactions.py # Test 2: Check for raw SQL queries not using text() echo "Checking for raw SQL queries not using text()..." rg -l "execute\(['\"]" api/src/shop/transactions.py # Test 3: Check for old-style filter/filter_by usage echo "Checking for potential old-style filter usage..." rg -l "query\([^)]+\)\.filter" api/src/shop/transactions.pyLength of output: 508
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the specific filter usage contexts rg -A 3 "query\([^)]+\)\.filter" api/src/shop/transactions.pyLength of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for modern select() style usage echo "Checking for modern select() usage..." rg "select\(" api/src/shop/transactions.py # Check for other query patterns echo "Checking other query patterns..." rg "db_session\." api/src/shop/transactions.pyLength of output: 939
api/src/firstrun.py (3)
Line range hint
42-42: Consider updating remaining SQLAlchemy query patterns.For consistency with SQLAlchemy 2's new style, consider updating these query patterns:
- db_session.query(func.max(model.display_order)).scalar() + db_session.scalar(select(func.max(model.display_order))) - db_session.query(model).filter_by(**kwargs).first() + db_session.scalars(select(model).filter_by(**kwargs)).first() - db_session.query(Permission) + db_session.scalars(select(Permission)) - db_session.query(Product).filter_by(category_id=tools_category.id).all() + db_session.scalars(select(Product).filter_by(category_id=tools_category.id)).all() - db_session.query(Product).all() + db_session.scalars(select(Product)).all()Note: Don't forget to add the import:
from sqlalchemy import selectAlso applies to: 53-53, 82-82, 386-386, 516-516
Line range hint
459-459: Address TODO comment about gift card product association.The comment indicates a pending implementation for gift card product association. This should be tracked and addressed, especially since it's in a data initialization script.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this TODO item?
Line range hint
1-577: Consider these improvements for better maintainability.
- Add type hints to function parameters and return values for better code maintainability.
- Consider moving hardcoded values (prices, member numbers, etc.) to configuration.
- Consider splitting test data creation into a separate module to keep the core initialization script focused.
Example of adding type hints:
- def next_display_order(model) -> int: + def next_display_order(model: Any) -> int: - def get_or_create(model, defaults=None, **kwargs): + def get_or_create(model: Any, defaults: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
- api/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
- api/src/core/auth.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/core/models.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/firstrun.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/init_db.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/member/member.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/member/views.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/membership/member_entity.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/membership/models.py (9 hunks)
- api/src/messages/models.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/migrate.py (4 hunks)
- api/src/multiaccessy/invite.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/multiaccessy/models.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/pytest.ini (0 hunks)
- api/src/quiz/models.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/quiz/views.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/service/auth.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/service/entity.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/shell_with_db.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/shop/email.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/shop/filters.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/shop/models.py (6 hunks)
- api/src/shop/ordered_entity.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/shop/pay.py (4 hunks)
- api/src/shop/shop_data.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/shop/stripe_customer.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/shop/stripe_event.py (3 hunks)
- api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/shop/stripe_subscriptions.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/shop/transactions.py (4 hunks)
- api/src/statistics/maker_statistics.py (2 hunks)
- api/src/systest/api/password_reset_test.py (1 hunks)
- api/src/test_aid/db.py (2 hunks)
- public/src/public.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- api/src/pytest.ini
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- api/src/messages/models.py
- api/src/multiaccessy/models.py
- api/src/shell_with_db.py
🔇 Additional comments (49)
api/requirements.txt (1)
4-4: Verify compatibility with type packages.The codebase includes both
types-sqlalchemyandsqlalchemy-stubs. Let's verify their compatibility with SQLAlchemy 2.0.✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the codebase is using SQLAlchemy 2.0 compatible query patterns. The key findings are:
- The codebase uses SQLAlchemy 2.0 style queries with
query()instead of legacyModel.query- Session management is properly handled with scoped sessions
- Relationship loading is done using modern patterns like
joinedload()andcontains_eager()- No deprecated SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns are found
Let me verify if there are any type stubs installed by searching for type packages in requirements files:
Both type packages are compatible with SQLAlchemy 2.0 - no action needed
The codebase already has both
types-sqlalchemyandsqlalchemy-stubsinstalled, and both packages support SQLAlchemy 2.0. The codebase is using modern SQLAlchemy 2.0 query patterns and proper type hints. No compatibility issues are found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the installed type packages support SQLAlchemy 2.0 # Test: Search for version constraints in package metadata rg -A 5 "SQLAlchemy" $(fd -t f "setup.py|pyproject.toml|setup.cfg" | grep -E "types-sqlalchemy|sqlalchemy-stubs")Length of output: 227929
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SQLAlchemy type packages in requirements files rg "types-sqlalchemy|sqlalchemy-stubs" -A 2 $(fd -t f "requirements.*\.txt")Length of output: 356
api/src/shop/email.py (1)
21-21: Similar error handling needed here.The same SQLAlchemy 2 syntax update and error handling concerns apply to this function.
api/src/shop/ordered_entity.py (1)
5-5: LGTM! Proper import for SQLAlchemy text construct.The addition of
textimport aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for raw SQL execution.api/src/shop/filters.py (1)
34-34: LGTM! Correct usage of SQLAlchemy 2's session.get() method.The change from
db_session.query(Member).get(member_id)todb_session.get(Member, member_id)aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended patterns for retrieving single records by primary key.api/src/init_db.py (2)
14-14: LGTM: SQLAlchemy text import added correctly.The addition of the
textimport aligns with SQLAlchemy 2.x's recommended approach for executing raw SQL queries.
Line range hint
1-85: Verify other raw SQL queries in the codebase.While this file has been updated to use SQLAlchemy 2.x's
text()construct, let's verify that all other raw SQL queries in the codebase have been similarly updated.✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more specific information about the raw SQL queries.
All raw SQL queries are properly using SQLAlchemy's text() construct
Based on the verification results:
- All direct SQL executions in the codebase are already using the
text()construct from SQLAlchemy- The
textimport is properly declared in all relevant files- No instances of raw SQL strings being executed without
text()were foundWhile there are many files using the
.query()style queries, these are ORM queries rather than raw SQL, so they don't require thetext()wrapper.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential raw SQL queries that might need the text() wrapper # Test 1: Look for direct session.execute calls that might need text() echo "Searching for potential raw SQL queries..." rg -l "session\.execute\(['\"]" --type py # Test 2: Look for query() usage that might need updating to select() echo "Searching for old-style query() usage..." rg -l "\.query\(" --type pyLength of output: 1807
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for direct session.execute calls with SQL strings, showing context echo "=== Direct SQL executions ===" rg -A 2 "session\.execute\(['\"].*" --type py # Search for text() import and usage to see if it's already properly used echo -e "\n=== text() imports and usage ===" rg "from sqlalchemy import.*text" --type py rg "text\(['\"].*" --type pyLength of output: 2344
api/src/service/auth.py (1)
36-36: LGTM! Correctly migrated to SQLAlchemy 2's simplified get syntax.The change from
db_session.query(AccessToken).get(token)todb_session.get(AccessToken, token)aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for retrieving single objects by primary key.api/src/systest/api/password_reset_test.py (1)
79-79: LGTM! Correct implementation of SQLAlchemy 2 session.get() patternThe change from
db_session.query(Member).get(member_id)todb_session.get(Member, member_id)aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for retrieving entities by primary key.api/src/core/models.py (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import consolidation follows SQLAlchemy 2 patterns.The consolidation of SQLAlchemy imports is consistent with the upgrade to version 2.
api/src/quiz/models.py (2)
3-3: LGTM! Import consolidation aligns with SQLAlchemy 2.x style.The consolidated import statement is cleaner and follows modern SQLAlchemy conventions.
50-50: Verify cascade behavior for delete operations.The addition of
cascade_backrefs=Falseto relationships is a good practice for SQLAlchemy 2.x as it makes the cascade behavior explicit. This change prevents unexpected cascading deletions through backrefs, which was the default behavior in SQLAlchemy 1.x.However, we should verify that this doesn't break existing delete operations in the application.
Let's check for any explicit delete operations that might be affected:
Also applies to: 69-69
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific delete operations in the views file to understand the impact better.
Setting
cascade_backrefs=Falseis safe in this contextThe codebase uses soft deletes (via
deleted_atcolumn) rather than actual record deletion for bothQuizQuestionandQuizQuestionOption. The relationship modification withcascade_backrefs=Falsewon't impact the existing functionality because:
- No hard delete operations are performed in the views
- All deletions are handled through
deleted_attimestamp columns- The queries properly filter out soft-deleted records using
deleted_at == None🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for delete operations on QuizQuestion, QuizQuestionOption, or QuizAnswer rg -l "delete.*(?:QuizQuestion|QuizQuestionOption|QuizAnswer)" --type py # Search for cascade delete configurations in related models ast-grep --pattern 'relationship($_, backref=$_, cascade=$_)'Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the delete operations in views.py with context rg "delete.*(?:QuizQuestion|QuizQuestionOption|QuizAnswer)" api/src/quiz/views.py -B 2 -A 2 # Let's also check all relationship definitions in models.py to understand the complete cascade setup rg "relationship\(" api/src/quiz/models.py -B 1 -A 1Length of output: 763
api/src/multiaccessy/invite.py (2)
31-31: LGTM! Correctly updated to SQLAlchemy 2 patternThe change from
query().get()toget()follows SQLAlchemy 2's recommended pattern for single-row lookups by primary key.
31-31: Verify similar member retrievals in reminder-related codeGiven the failing test
test_reminder_message_is_created_20_days_before_expiry_even_if_other_span_after, we should verify that similar member retrievals in reminder-related code have been updated to SQLAlchemy 2 patterns.Also applies to: 70-70
api/src/member/member.py (1)
Line range hint
61-64: LGTM! Good error handling for PIN code validation.The addition of specific error handling for DataError with a clear error message improves the robustness of the code.
api/src/membership/member_entity.py (2)
8-8: LGTM: SQLAlchemy 2 compatible import added.The addition of the
textimport aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for handling raw SQL queries.
50-50: LGTM: Proper use of SQLAlchemy 2's text construct.The migration from raw SQL string to
text()construct is correctly implemented and maintains the existing functionality while adhering to SQLAlchemy 2's best practices.api/src/shop/stripe_customer.py (1)
110-110: LGTM! Correctly updated to SQLAlchemy 2's preferred method.The change from
db_session.query(Member).get(member_id)todb_session.get(Member, member_id)aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for retrieving objects by primary key.Let's verify that no old-style queries remain in this file:
✅ Verification successful
No remaining old-style SQLAlchemy queries found in this file
After reviewing the entire file content, I can confirm that there are no remaining instances of the old-style
db_session.query().get()pattern. The only database retrieval operation in the file is the updated line we reviewed, which correctly uses SQLAlchemy 2'sdb_session.get(Member, member_id)syntax.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining old-style SQLAlchemy queries in this file rg -U "db_session\.query\([^)]+\)\.get\(" "api/src/shop/stripe_customer.py"Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the entire file content to verify all database query patterns cat api/src/shop/stripe_customer.pyLength of output: 4948
api/src/shop/shop_data.py (2)
21-21: LGTM: Import addition aligns with query changes.The addition of
TransactionContentto the imports is necessary to support the explicit joined loading patterns introduced in this file.
54-54: LGTM: Query optimization using explicit joined loads.The nested joinedload pattern is more explicit and aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's best practices. However, let's verify the query performance impact.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate a final response.
Verified: Query optimization pattern is consistently applied
The codebase scan reveals that the nested joinedload pattern is already consistently used in
shop_data.pyand there are no conflicting eager loading patterns across the Transaction-related queries. The optimization is correctly applied where needed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar query patterns that might need the same optimization # and verify there are no conflicting query patterns. echo "Checking for similar query patterns that might need optimization..." rg -l "query\(Transaction\)" | while read -r file; do echo "=== $file ===" rg "query\(Transaction\).+options\(" "$file" -A 2 done echo "Checking for potential conflicting eager loading patterns..." rg "joinedload\(Transaction" -A 2Length of output: 2330
api/src/migrate.py (3)
10-10: LGTM: Import of SQLAlchemy text construct.The addition of the
textimport is appropriate for the SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade.
Line range hint
1-141: Verify complete migration to SQLAlchemy 2 style.Let's ensure no old-style SQLAlchemy queries remain in the codebase.
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential old-style SQLAlchemy queries echo "Checking for old-style SQLAlchemy patterns..." # Look for direct string SQL execution without text() rg "execute\(['\"]" --type py # Look for old-style query API rg "\.query\(" --type py # Look for old-style filter syntax rg "\.filter\(" --type py
29-29:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for character set conversion.
The database character set modification is a critical operation that could fail if there's existing incompatible data.
Consider adding error handling:
-session.execute(text("ALTER DATABASE makeradmin CHARACTER SET = utf8mb4 COLLATE = utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci")) +try: + session.execute(text("ALTER DATABASE makeradmin CHARACTER SET = utf8mb4 COLLATE = utf8mb4_0900_ai_ci")) +except Exception as e: + logger.error(f"Failed to convert database character set: {e}") + raiseLet's verify the current charset:
api/src/core/auth.py (1)
134-134: LGTM! SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade change looks good.The change from
query().get()tosession.get()aligns with SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for retrieving entities by primary key.Let's verify if there are other similar patterns in this file that need updating:
✅ Verification successful
No remaining SQLAlchemy 1.x
query().get()patterns foundThe search results confirm that:
- All direct primary key retrievals use the new SQLAlchemy 2.x
session.get()pattern- Other query operations (filter, filter_by, one, delete) are still valid in SQLAlchemy 2.x and don't require changes
- The remaining
.get()calls are dictionary lookups (SERVICE_NAMES.get, SERVICE_PERMISSIONS.get), not database operations🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining query().get() patterns in the file rg -l "query\(.*\)\.get\(" api/src/core/auth.pyLength of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for any remaining query() patterns rg "query\(" api/src/core/auth.py # Also search for other get() patterns to ensure completeness rg "\.get\(" api/src/core/auth.pyLength of output: 1134
api/src/membership/models.py (4)
21-21: LGTM: Import path updated for SQLAlchemy 2The import path change for
declarative_basefollows SQLAlchemy 2's reorganized module structure.
115-118: LGTM: Select statement updated for SQLAlchemy 2The select statement has been correctly simplified to match SQLAlchemy 2's query style while maintaining the same functionality.
74-74: Verify the impact of cascade_backrefs=FalseThe addition of
cascade_backrefs=Falseto all relationships is aligned with SQLAlchemy 2's recommendations. However, this change modifies the cascade behavior which could affect how related objects are saved or deleted.Let's verify the existing cascade behavior in the codebase:
Please ensure to test the following scenarios:
- Deleting a Member with associated records
- Deleting a Group with members
- Adding/Removing members to/from groups
Consider documenting these cascade behavior changes in your migration guide.
Also applies to: 100-102, 104-106, 144-144, 167-167, 193-193, 218-218
✅ Verification successful
The previous script had syntax issues. This new script will help us understand:
- How deletions are performed in the codebase
- How relationships are modified
- What cascade configurations exist
- How session operations are handled
This will give us better context about the impact of
cascade_backrefs=False.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now generate the final response:
Setting cascade_backrefs=False is safe and recommended
The change to add
cascade_backrefs=Falseto all relationships is safe and follows SQLAlchemy 2.0 best practices. The codebase evidence shows:
All relationship modifications are handled explicitly through:
- Direct
db_session.add()calls for new objects- Explicit relationship management using
append()for collections- Clear
db_session.delete()operations for removalsNo code relies on implicit cascading behavior through backrefs, as all operations are explicitly managed through:
- Transaction management in
shop/transactions.py- Member management in
membership/modules- Group/permission handling in
membership/models.pyThe change is consistently applied across all relationship definitions, maintaining a uniform cascade behavior throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential cascade delete operations that might be affected # Look for delete operations on these models echo "Searching for delete operations that might be affected by cascade changes..." rg -l "delete.*(?:Member|Group|Key|Span|Box|PhoneNumberChangeRequest)" --type py # Look for save/add operations that might be affected echo "Searching for save operations that might be affected by cascade changes..." rg -l "(?:add|save).*(?:Member|Group|Key|Span|Box|PhoneNumberChangeRequest)" --type pyLength of output: 815
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to search for cascade-related operations # Check for delete operations echo "Checking delete operations..." rg "\.delete\(\)" --type py -B 2 -A 2 # Check for relationship modifications echo -e "\nChecking relationship modifications..." rg "(?:append|remove|add|pop)\(" --type py -B 2 -A 2 # Check for SQLAlchemy cascade configurations echo -e "\nChecking cascade configurations..." rg "cascade.*=.*" --type py -B 1 -A 1 # Check for session operations that might be affected echo -e "\nChecking session operations..." rg "session\.(add|delete|commit)" --type py -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 129298
167-167: Investigate failing test related to Span modelThe test
test_reminder_message_is_created_20_days_before_expiry_even_if_other_span_afteris failing. This might be related to the cascade behavior changes in the Span model's relationship with Member.Let's analyze the test and related code:
api/src/shop/stripe_payment_intent.py (1)
117-117: LGTM! Correct migration to SQLAlchemy 2 pattern.The change from
query().get()toget()follows SQLAlchemy 2's recommended pattern while maintaining proper error handling.api/src/test_aid/db.py (1)
21-21: LGTM! The SQLAlchemy 2.x compatibility changes look good.The changes correctly implement the new SQLAlchemy 2.x style by:
- Importing the
textconstruct- Wrapping the raw SQL query with
text()inget_member_numberAlso applies to: 169-169
api/src/quiz/views.py (2)
8-8: LGTM: Import changes align with SQLAlchemy 2 requirements.The addition of
textimport is necessary for proper raw SQL query execution in SQLAlchemy 2.
82-82: LGTM: Entity retrieval updated to SQLAlchemy 2 style.The change to
db_session.get()follows SQLAlchemy 2's recommended approach for single entity retrieval by primary key.api/src/shop/models.py (6)
21-21: LGTM! Clean import organization.The consolidation of SQLAlchemy ORM imports improves code organization.
171-171: Verify action status consistency.The modification of cascade behavior between TransactionContent and TransactionAction needs careful verification to ensure action status consistency is maintained, especially for pending actions.
Let's check for any status-dependent operations:
#!/bin/bash # Search for status-dependent operations in transaction actions rg -B 3 -A 3 "TransactionAction.*status.*PENDING|TransactionAction.*status.*COMPLETED" --type py
151-151: Verify transaction-related cascade operations.The modification of cascade behavior in TransactionContent could affect transaction integrity. We should ensure that transaction cleanup operations (if any) are not affected.
Let's search for transaction-related cascade operations:
#!/bin/bash # Search for transaction cleanup or cascade operations rg -B 5 -A 5 "Transaction.*delete|delete.*Transaction" --type py
231-231: Verify gift card operations integrity.The modification of cascade behavior for gift cards needs verification to ensure proper handling of gift card validation and usage tracking.
Let's check for gift card validation and usage operations:
#!/bin/bash # Search for gift card validation and status update operations rg -B 3 -A 3 "GiftCard.*status|status.*GiftCard" --type py
277-278: Verify accounting data integrity.The modification of cascade behavior in accounting relationships needs verification to ensure proper handling of accounting entries and cost center allocations.
Let's check for accounting-related operations:
#!/bin/bash # Search for accounting data operations rg -B 3 -A 3 "ProductAccountsCostCenters.*fraction|ProductAccountsCostCenters.*type" --type py
76-80: Verify cascade behavior changes.The addition of
cascade_backrefs=Falseis aligned with SQLAlchemy 2's recommendations, but we should verify that this doesn't break existing cascade operations, especially for product deletions that might need to cascade to related records.Let's check for any existing cascade delete operations:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The
cascade_backrefs=Falsechange is safe to implementThe codebase shows that Product relationships are managed through soft deletes (
deleted_atcolumn) rather than actual database cascading deletes. The search results reveal:
- Products use soft deletion via
deleted_atcolumn (e.g.,Product.deleted_at.is_(None)in queries)- Test cleanup uses explicit deletion order rather than relying on cascades
- No cascade delete configurations found in relationship definitions
- Related models (ProductAction, ProductAccountsCostCenters) are cleaned up explicitly when needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for cascade delete operations involving Product model rg -l "cascade.*delete|delete.*cascade" --type pyLength of output: 1081
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search for relationship definitions and cascade configurations in the Product model rg -B 3 -A 3 "class Product.*:|relationship.*Product|Product.*relationship" --type py # Also search for any delete operations or tests involving Product rg -B 2 -A 2 "delete.*Product|Product.*delete" --type pyLength of output: 13201
api/src/shop/pay.py (1)
224-227: Verify handling of insufficient funds scenario.The comment indicates that insufficient funds should trigger an email notification. This might be related to the failing test
test_reminder_message_is_created_20_days_before_expiry_even_if_other_span_after.Let's verify the email notification logic:
api/src/statistics/maker_statistics.py (1)
14-14: LGTM! Import aligns with SQLAlchemy 2 requirements.The addition of
textimport is necessary for the raw SQL query handling in SQLAlchemy 2.api/src/service/entity.py (2)
Line range hint
319-332: LGTM! Consistent use of Session.get() in update operation.The migration to
session.get()is correctly implemented while maintaining the existing error handling and update logic.
Line range hint
307-346: Verify impact on failing reminder message test.While the SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration changes in this file are correct, there's a failing test related to reminder messages:
PYTEST_ADDOPTS='-k test_reminder_message_is_created_20_days_before_expiry_even_if_other_span_after' make testLet's investigate if these entity changes might affect the reminder message functionality:
#!/bin/bash # Search for reminder message related code that might be affected by the SQLAlchemy changes rg -l "reminder.*message" | xargs rg "db_session\.(query|get)" # Search for any model classes related to reminders rg -l "class.*Reminder" | xargs catapi/src/shop/transactions.py (2)
28-28: LGTM: SQLAlchemy 2.x compatible import added.The addition of
textimport from sqlalchemy is appropriate for the SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade, as it's the recommended way to construct raw SQL queries in the new version.
185-187: LGTM: Member retrieval updated to SQLAlchemy 2.x style.The changes correctly implement SQLAlchemy 2's simplified API for retrieving objects by primary key. The error handling is appropriate, with clear error messages when members are not found.
Also applies to: 346-348
api/src/firstrun.py (1)
137-137: LGTM! Clean upgrade to SQLAlchemy 2's simplified get syntax.The change from
db_session.query(Member).get(member_id)todb_session.get(Member, member_id)correctly implements SQLAlchemy 2's new pattern for retrieving entities by primary key. This modification:
- Maintains the same functionality while being more concise
- Properly integrates with the existing error handling
- Aligns with the PR objective of upgrading to SQLAlchemy 2
api/src/shop/stripe_event.py (3)
143-146: LGTM: SQLAlchemy 2.0 compliant member retrievalThe update to use
db_session.get()follows SQLAlchemy 2.0's recommended pattern for retrieving single objects by primary key. The error handling for non-existent members is properly maintained.
287-290: LGTM: SQLAlchemy 2.0 compliant member retrievalThe update to use
db_session.get()is consistent with SQLAlchemy 2.0's patterns and maintains proper error handling for non-existent members.
365-368: LGTM: SQLAlchemy 2.0 compliant member retrieval with improved type annotationThe update to use
db_session.get()follows SQLAlchemy 2.0's patterns. The addition of the type annotationOptional[Member]improves code clarity and type safety.api/src/shop/stripe_subscriptions.py (2)
442-442: LGTM! Clean SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade.The change from
query(Member).get(member_id)toget(Member, member_id)correctly implements SQLAlchemy 2's simplified API for retrieving records by primary key.
496-496: LGTM! Clean SQLAlchemy 2 upgrade.The change from
query(Member).get(member_id)toget(Member, member_id)correctly implements SQLAlchemy 2's simplified API for retrieving records by primary key.
api/requirements.txt
Outdated
| flask | ||
| flask_cors | ||
| sqlalchemy>=1.4.9,<2.0 | ||
| sqlalchemy~=2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration concern:
Review SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration requirements and impact
The codebase requires significant updates to be SQLAlchemy 2.0 compatible:
-
Current SQLAlchemy 1.x patterns found:
- Extensive use of deprecated
query()API throughout - Legacy session management using
scoped_sessionandsessionmaker - Direct use of
text()for raw SQL queries - Heavy use of relationship loading with
joinedload()
- Extensive use of deprecated
-
Required changes:
- Replace
query()withselect()statements - Update session management to use 2.0-style context managers
- Migrate raw SQL queries to use 2.0-style text() with parameters
- Review and update relationship loading patterns
- Add type annotations for better 2.0 compatibility
- Replace
-
Migration strategy:
- Enable SQLAlchemy 1.x deprecation warnings
- Incrementally update query patterns starting with core functionality
- Test thoroughly as SQLAlchemy 2.0 has stricter typing requirements
🔗 Analysis chain
Review SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration guide for breaking changes.
Given that SQLAlchemy 2.0 introduces significant API changes and the PR comments indicate failing tests, please ensure you've reviewed the SQLAlchemy 2.0 Migration Guide. Key areas to focus on:
- Query API changes (
.query()→.select()) - Session API changes
- ORM relationship loading changes
- Type annotation changes
Based on the search results, I can see extensive usage of SQLAlchemy 1.x style query patterns throughout the codebase. The key findings are:
- Heavy use of
query()API which is deprecated in SQLAlchemy 2.0 - Extensive use of relationship loading patterns like
joinedload() - Session management and transaction patterns that may need updates
Let me verify if there are any SQLAlchemy 2.0 style queries already present to determine if migration is in progress.
Based on the search results, I can see that the codebase heavily uses SQLAlchemy 1.x style query patterns and needs migration to 2.0. The key findings are:
- Extensive use of deprecated
query()API throughout the codebase - Current session management using
scoped_sessionandsessionmaker - No explicit use of SQLAlchemy 2.0 style
select()statements - Heavy use of relationship loading with
joinedload()
Let me verify if there are any SQLAlchemy 2.0 migration attempts or configuration settings.
Let me try a different search pattern to verify SQLAlchemy configuration and potential 2.0 migration attempts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potentially affected SQLAlchemy patterns that need migration
# Test 1: Search for old-style query patterns
echo "Checking for old-style query patterns..."
rg "\.query\(" -A 3
# Test 2: Search for session usage patterns
echo "Checking for session usage patterns..."
rg "Session|session" -A 3
# Test 3: Search for relationship loading patterns
echo "Checking for relationship loading patterns..."
rg "relationship|joinedload|subqueryload" -A 3
Length of output: 227929
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQLAlchemy 2.0 style select() patterns
rg "select\(\)" -A 3
# Search for Session configuration to check SQLAlchemy version settings
rg "create_engine|Session" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 142951
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQLAlchemy configuration and engine setup
rg "sqlalchemy\.(url|future|engine|create_engine)" -A 3
# Search for any SQLAlchemy 2.0 style select() statements
rg "select\(\)" -A 3 --type py
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQLAlchemy imports and configuration
rg "from sqlalchemy" -A 2
# Search for SQLAlchemy engine configuration
rg "engine.*=.*create_engine" -A 2
# Search for any SQLAlchemy 2.0 style operations
rg "with.*Session" -A 2
Length of output: 8419
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
emanuelen5
force-pushed
the
sqlalchemy-2-upgrade
branch
from
97dbb99 to
24e635b
Compare
emanuelen5
force-pushed
the
sqlalchemy-2-upgrade
branch
from
21911b4 to
816ce8e
Compare
Upgrade statement to SQLalchemy 2.0 Upgrade statement to SQLalchemy 2.0 Fix incorrect migration
Not needed after upgrade to sqlalchemy 2.0
emanuelen5
force-pushed
the
sqlalchemy-2-upgrade
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0e9d5e6 to
d92277a
Compare
emanuelen5
force-pushed
the
sqlalchemy-2-upgrade
branch
from
d92277a to
ed6e537
Compare
Closes #489
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
text()construct for improved clarity and maintainability.Bug Fixes
Chores
sqlalchemyto ensure compatibility with version 2.0.