Add --only-explicit option to exclude indirect dependencies
#60
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mattbrictson
force-pushed
the
features/only-explicit
branch
from
313245b to
561c46a
Compare
mattbrictson
changed the title
--only-explicit--only-explicit option
mattbrictson
changed the title
--only-explicit option--only-explicit
mattbrictson
changed the title
--only-explicit--only-explicit option to exclude indirect dependencies
mattbrictson
force-pushed
the
features/only-explicit
branch
from
396a4a3 to
5d041d4
Compare
mattbrictson
force-pushed
the
features/only-explicit
branch
from
5d041d4 to
5a61ad8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You can now pass
--only-explicit, which limits updates to only those gems that are explicitly listed in the Gemfile. In other words, this option lets you ignore indirect dependencies.Closes #55