Skip to content

Conversation

@Pkylas007
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 commented Dec 2, 2025

JIRA

Version

  • 8.0.0

Preview

What changed

  • Changed the user guide title to Configuring and using rules for MTA analysis.
  • Introducing assemblies for all sections and introductions in assemblies.
  • Introduced new modules for nested conditions, custom Go rule, custom Python rule, and custom Node.js rule.
  • Rewrote the introduction in some of the assemblies and provided internal links to target modules.
  • Provided examples for Java locations and provider capability fields.

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 force-pushed the mta-5290-rules-dev-mod-work branch 2 times, most recently from 96f3bae to 4f8cbbe Compare December 8, 2025 02:39
* `node.js`
* `python`
+
:FeatureName: dotnet provider
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rromannissen @dymurray @ibragins Please could you confirm if the technology preview note is required here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for confirming that dotnet is a developer preview feature! Will correct the admonition.

name: sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4
lowerbound: v4.2.0
----
.3+|xref:yaml-dotnet-provider_rule-provider-conditions[dotnet]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmle Please review the dotnet provider content in the table.

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 force-pushed the mta-5290-rules-dev-mod-work branch from 6e724bd to 5af7f16 Compare December 11, 2025 08:39
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <[email protected]>
@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 force-pushed the mta-5290-rules-dev-mod-work branch from 32146b0 to a09e56b Compare December 12, 2025 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant