Skip to content

Conversation

@aleksanb
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@aleksanb aleksanb force-pushed the next-step-require branch 2 times, most recently from 383aaee to 76bd21d Compare April 24, 2017 22:28
@sigvef
Copy link
Member

sigvef commented Apr 24, 2017

needs rebase

This keeps the namespace and import tree clean,
as single files with just one class definition like TextureInput and
TextureOutput were a bit overkill.
@aleksanb aleksanb force-pushed the next-step-require branch from 76bd21d to 028f1f5 Compare April 24, 2017 23:15
@cristeahub
Copy link
Member

Why is the closure compiler commented out for the time being?

I also did a small comment on e934b92 , and the question here is what are you guys doing and how can I track it? There's no issues or discussions on what has been done I believe, so it's hard for me to contribute right now.

@aleksanb aleksanb force-pushed the next-step-require branch from 028f1f5 to 6c33182 Compare April 25, 2017 22:14
If they are needed, they can be re-added manually to each demo project's
lib folder.
This slims down bootstrap.js and makes my task of requiring up
bootstrap.js easier.

They're not used in the demo 're', so we don't have to maintain any
potential backwards compatability.
@sigvef
Copy link
Member

sigvef commented Jul 30, 2017

needs rebase

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants