[Storage] Optimize batch store same collection #8125
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
zhangchiqing
requested review from
AlexHentschel,
jordanschalm and
peterargue
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
The Access Node may receive the same collection from multiple sources (collection node via fetching or execution Node via execution data syncing), causing redundant store and index operations.
PR
Added early abort logic to BatchStoreAndIndexByTransaction that skips database writes when all transactions are already indexed and point to the same collection, avoiding redundant operations when storing the same collection multiple times.