test

[lslsilva86]

Description

Related Issues

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Documentation
• Refactor
• Other (please describe):

Testing

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional Notes

---

Important

Adds a new heading ## hello to the beginning of README.md.

• Documentation:
  • Adds a new heading ## hello at the beginning of README.md.

^{This description was created by for d6c422c. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README: added a new top-level heading and a blank line, included a brief inline note regarding back-to-top link compatibility, and made minor formatting clarifications. These are documentation-only changes and do not affect application behavior or runtime logic.

[vercel]

@lslsilva86 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Onlook Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

README.md: added a new top-level markdown header "## hello2222" and an inline comment about back-to-top link compatibility. No code or runtime behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation updates README.md	Added new top-level markdown header "## hello2222" and a following blank line; inserted an inline comment regarding back-to-top link compatibility; no code changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• No functional files changed; skim README.md to confirm wording.

Poem

🐰
I hopped into the README bright,
Placed "hello2222" beneath the light,
A tiny note on links I leave,
No code disturbed — just whitespace cleave,
Hooray for tidy docs tonight!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	While the PR description follows the required template structure with all appropriate section headings present, every single substantive section is left completely empty as placeholder comments. The Description, Related Issues, Type of Change, Testing, Screenshots, and Additional Notes sections contain only HTML comments with no actual content or information filled in. Although an auto-generated Ellipsis summary was appended at the bottom, the author-provided description itself is entirely unfilled, making it impossible to understand the rationale, context, or verification approach for these changes.	Complete the PR description by filling in each required section with relevant information. At minimum, provide a clear description of the changes made, specify which type of change applies (e.g., Documentation), and describe how the changes were tested. This will provide reviewers with essential context for evaluating the pull request.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title is simply "test," which is an extremely vague and generic term that fails to convey any meaningful information about the changeset. While the actual changes involve adding a new markdown header "## hello2222" to the README.md file, the title provides no indication of this work. The title uses exactly the kind of non-descriptive phrasing that makes it impossible for a teammate scanning the repository history to understand what the primary change accomplishes.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6c422c and 1f05e78.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ccd2302 and d6c422c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

3-3: Good addition.

The HTML comment documenting improved back-to-top link compatibility is a helpful best practice that clarifies the markdown pattern used and cites the source. No concerns here.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove stray test artifact.

The "## hello" header appears to be a leftover test or placeholder with no meaningful content. This should be removed unless you intended to add a new documentation section with specific content.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

README.md lines 1-2: remove the stray test placeholder "## hello" from the top
of the README; delete that header (or replace it with a meaningful section title
and content if you intended to add documentation) so the README contains only
intentional, relevant content.