Skip to content

Conversation

@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member

The errata-check.sh script is no longer needed in this repository.

The errata-check.sh script is no longer needed in this repository.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mtnbikenc: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

The errata-check.sh script is no longer needed in this repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented Nov 5, 2025

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mtnbikenc, sebsoto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 5, 2025
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

jrvaldes commented Nov 5, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 5, 2025
@mtnbikenc mtnbikenc marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2025 18:25
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1849ebc and 2 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 33b44b0 and 1 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 61e5bb4 and 0 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision b9861de was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 6, 2025
@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member Author

@sebsoto It looks like there are cluster install issues on nutanix. Can that job be overridden or is there something more to investigate?

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

changes are not used in the e2e

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 17, 2025
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

@sebsoto It looks like there are cluster install issues on nutanix. Can that job be overridden or is there something more to investigate?

done. Thanks opening the PR @mtnbikenc

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

changes are not used in the e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec5730d and 2 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 179e0be and 1 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade, ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator, ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD eb9ae2f and 0 for PR HEAD b9861de in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision b9861de was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 18, 2025
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade, ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator, ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/images

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/images

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4759ffc into openshift:master Nov 18, 2025
18 checks passed
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@mtnbikenc: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mtnbikenc mtnbikenc deleted the remove-errata-check-script branch November 18, 2025 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants