-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
[VLM] Optimize vision preprocessing for LLaVA-NeXT-Video #3097
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
andrew-k-park
wants to merge
8
commits into
openvinotoolkit:master
Choose a base branch
from
andrew-k-park:preproc_opt_for_llava_next_video
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+343
−69
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f8ab210
Add OpenVINO-based preprocessing pipeline for LLaVA-NeXT-Video 7B
andrew-k-park cc66f07
Apply comments
andrew-k-park 94ad0fc
fix lint
andrew-k-park b31bf40
Integrate video preprocessing into vision encoder for LLaVA-NeXT-Video
andrew-k-park 43e66c6
Apply comments
andrew-k-park a3b8e66
Fix CI failure
andrew-k-park 7652593
clean up code
andrew-k-park 1ad6bb1
Apply comments
andrew-k-park File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
367 changes: 316 additions & 51 deletions
367
src/cpp/src/visual_language/llava_next_video/classes.cpp
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test is missing. That's something we didn't think about earlier, so you can skip it in this PR. Would be nice if you added it as a separate PR. There are tests on preresized images. The new test should verify that the images that don't trigger a resize give the same result with and without
VISION_PREPROCESSThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you mind if I handle this in a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure