Skip to content

Conversation

@jameslaneovermind
Copy link
Contributor

We are getting two risks where I just want to show one off, the other is a valid risk however for demo simplicity i dont want it there hence this fix.

We are getting two risks where I just want to show one off, the other is a valid risk however for demo simplicity i dont want it there hence this fix.
@env0
Copy link

env0 bot commented Dec 17, 2025

🚀  env0 had composed a PR Plan for environment Terraform Example / production :

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
Plan Details
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
!   update in-place

Terraform will perform the following actions:


  # module.heritage[0].aws_rds_cluster.face_database will be updated in-place
!   resource "aws_rds_cluster" "face_database" {
        id                                    = "facial-recognition-terraform-example"
        tags                                  = {}
        # (46 unchanged attributes hidden)

        # (1 unchanged block hidden)
    }

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
Failed to calculate cost estimation

Full PR Plan logs on env0

@github-actions
Copy link

Overmind

Open in Overmind ↗


model|risks_v6

🔥 Risks

[!NOTE] > Overmind has not identified any risks associated with this change
This could be due to the change being low risk with no impact on other parts of the system, or involving resources that Overmind currently does not support.


🟣 Expected Changes

Note

No expected changes found.



💥 Blast Radius

Items 0

Edges 0

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overmind

✅ Auto-Approved


🟢 Decision

Auto-approved: All safety checks passed


🔥 Risks Summary

High 0 · Medium 0 · Low 0


View full analysis in Overmind ↗

@jameslaneovermind jameslaneovermind merged commit 1b5e3c9 into main Dec 17, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@jameslaneovermind jameslaneovermind deleted the fix_risks_for_demo branch December 17, 2025 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants