Skip to content

Conversation

@coastalwhite
Copy link
Collaborator

@coastalwhite coastalwhite commented Oct 6, 2025

Fixes #22279.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Oct 6, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.83%. Comparing base (39097fa) to head (1118afe).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/polars-plan/src/dsl/function_expr/mod.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
py-polars/src/polars/expr/expr.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #24772      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.85%   81.83%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1689     1691       +2     
  Lines      230819   230820       +1     
  Branches     2990     2992       +2     
==========================================
- Hits       188935   188890      -45     
- Misses      41124    41169      +45     
- Partials      760      761       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 90ceb7b to e9fce55 Compare October 26, 2025 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate pl.Expr.rechunk

1 participant