Skip to content

Conversation

@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request to track merging of further changes from @mmarzett.

@adamant-pwn adamant-pwn requested a review from hmusta July 25, 2024 15:04
@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also see ratschlab/sshash#10 for related changes in sshash repo.

@hmusta
Copy link
Collaborator

hmusta commented Oct 8, 2024

As mentioned during a previous meeting, I think annotating based on monotigs (monochromatic contigs) makes more sense. I've started an implementation at #500. Are there any fixes from the sshash library used here that we should port over there?

@adamant-pwn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not very familiar with this branch, and my fixes mostly were to properly merge changes from #481 into it and make sure it still compiles and passes current tests. Is #500 implemented fully from scratch without relying on the content of this branch? If so, we can drop this branch, I suppose.

@hmusta
Copy link
Collaborator

hmusta commented Oct 8, 2024

I'm not very familiar with this branch, and my fixes mostly were to properly merge changes from #481 into it and make sure it still compiles and passes current tests. Is #500 implemented fully from scratch without relying on the content of this branch? If so, we can drop this branch, I suppose.

Yes, it's implemented from scratch. So I'll close this.

@hmusta hmusta closed this Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants