Skip to content

Conversation

@e-kotov
Copy link
Contributor

@e-kotov e-kotov commented Sep 2, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@mpadge mpadge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @e-kotov, once you've accepted that suggested change, we'll be good to merge

Co-authored-by: mark padgham <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.44%. Comparing base (c41ad99) to head (611b238).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #305   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.44%   92.44%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        3483     3483           
=======================================
  Hits         3220     3220           
  Misses        263      263           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mpadge mpadge merged commit 165c1c1 into ropensci-review-tools:main Sep 2, 2025
8 checks passed
@e-kotov e-kotov deleted the unique-fn-names branch September 2, 2025 10:32
mpadge added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants