Skip to content

Conversation

@scality-gdoumergue
Copy link
Contributor

  • Show details of the errors when they happen
  • Display the bucket's name
  • Display the IsLatest field

This script has been tested in a lab:

  • When the bucket doesn't exist: The script logs a 404 HTTP code error
  • When the bucket is not versioned nor replicated: the script doesn't break
  • When the ak/sk pair is wrong: The script logs a 403 HTTP code error
  • When the IAM user doesn't have the right to list the bucket: The script logs a 403 HTTP code error
  • When the IAM user doesn't have the right to HEAD objects: The script logs a 403 HTTP code error

- Show details of the errors when they happen
- Display the bucket's name
- Display the IsLatest field
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 23, 2026

Hello scality-gdoumergue,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 23, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue S3UTILS-217 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 1.18.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of S3UTILS-217, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 20.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 43.73%. Comparing base (d938738) to head (36212e1).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js 20.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/1     #367      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage          43.76%   43.73%   -0.03%     
=================================================
  Files                 84       84              
  Lines               5962     5966       +4     
  Branches            1256     1256              
=================================================
  Hits                2609     2609              
- Misses              3307     3311       +4     
  Partials              46       46              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code itself LGTM, nothing to say here.

But, recently I spent some time to make sure we can test this script in the CI, previously there was none. So if you have the time in hand, and can have a look at this file and if you are able to add some tests that would be great. If not, no worries, I'll take note and create a ticket on my end to do so.

Some notes:

Those tests do require a tool we created to simulate a small s3c env called workbench, to install it:

curl -L -o /tmp/workbench.tar.gz https://github.com/scality/workbench/releases/download/v0.8.0/workbench_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
tar -xzf /tmp/workbench.tar.gz -C /tmp
sudo install /tmp/workbench /usr/local/bin/workbench

Run it inside s3utils repo, like so:

workbench up --env-dir ./workbench/env -d

You'll then be able to run those particular test like so:

yarn jest --verbose --logHeapUsage --projects jest.config.js  --coverage --testPathPattern='tests/functional/listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js'

Again, only if you have the time in hand, just let me know.

Key,
VersionId,
IsLatest,
error: err
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can help logging error messages when the message field is dynamically computed:

Suggested change
error: err
error: err.message

}, err => {
if (err) {
log.error('error processing batch of objects', {
error: err,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants