Skip to content

Conversation

@AneerudhS27
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:

    • All solutions are correct and efficient, matching the optimal time and space complexities.
    • The code is generally well-structured and readable.
    • Good use of comments to explain the logic, though some could be clearer.
  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Avoid using #include<bits/stdc++.h>; instead, include only the necessary headers (e.g., <vector>, <iostream>).
    • Improve the clarity of comments, especially in trappingRainWater.cpp, to better explain the logic.
    • Consider adding edge case checks (e.g., empty input) for robustness, though the current implementations handle them correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants