Skip to content

Conversation

@yannham
Copy link
Member

@yannham yannham commented Sep 17, 2024

Nickel formatting of annotated let-bindings

Closes #743

Description

This is a tentative fix of #743, but I have yet to figure out how to properly handle the indentation part.

Checklist

Checklist before merging:

  • CHANGELOG.md updated
  • README.md up-to-date

@ErinvanderVeen ErinvanderVeen marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 09:35
@yannham yannham force-pushed the nickel/fix-multiline-let branch from dbc5dce to 3f0eaf6 Compare September 19, 2024 12:47
This commit fixes some indentation issue with annotated let-bindings
(#743). All the proposals of said
issue couldn't be implemented in current Topiary, so this only takes
care of the `in` placement. This commit refactors a bit the associated
queries and tries to improve documentation.
@yannham yannham force-pushed the nickel/fix-multiline-let branch from 5bcb061 to bdfb683 Compare September 19, 2024 12:50
@yannham yannham marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 12:50
@yannham yannham requested a review from nbacquey September 19, 2024 12:50
@yannham yannham merged commit 7229c0f into main Sep 20, 2024
9 checks passed
@yannham yannham deleted the nickel/fix-multiline-let branch September 20, 2024 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent placement of in depending on the term being annotated

2 participants