-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 3.8k
CASSANDRA-20982: Restrict BytesType value compatibility to scalar types, exclude collections and UDTs #4439
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Dekrate
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:trunk
Choose a base branch
from
Dekrate:dekrate/20982/trunk
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+94
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| Restrict BytesType compatibility to scalar types only | ||
|
|
||
| BytesType.isValueCompatibleWith() previously accepted all types, | ||
| including frozen collections and UDTs. This was incorrect because | ||
| converting collections or UDTs to raw bytes is nonsensical - it | ||
| allows reading raw serialized bytes which have no meaningful | ||
| interpretation. | ||
|
|
||
| This patch restricts BytesType to only accept simple scalar types | ||
| by checking !isCollection() && !isUDT() in isValueCompatibleWithInternal(). | ||
|
|
||
| patch by Dekrate for CASSANDRA-20982 | ||
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doing this here will break cql CAST operations, which I think we still might want to allow since they are explicit, and different from finding a column you re-added contains junk bytes.
Also,
isMultiCellwill return false for frozen collections.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@driftx, should I revert to the first version?
return !otherType.isCollection() && !otherType.isUDT();There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes and we shouldn't do this in
isValueCompatibleWithInternalsince it will prevent CASTing to bytes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@driftx, thanks! Could you please suggest any particular place to put it in?
To sum up:
isValueCompatibleWithInternalreturns true backreturn !otherType.isCollection() && !otherType.isUDT();will be in the other place?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe this
isSerializationCompatibleWith?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isSerializationCompatibleWithwill prevent the schema change but still allow the cast.